> Please. You're not talking about the same thing. Ben talks about the
> benefits such a vm would have once it would be done, you talk about how hard
> it would be to do it.

Exactly, thanks.

I assume it's save to say that most today (business) critical
applications have to be written in a vm supported language. What is
with Ocamls vm then?
I have the impression that only little development is going into
Ocamls vm. Or is that wrong? If no - what is the reason for this? What
if ocamlopt would be dropped for a faster ocaml vm? Would that be an
option?