Browse thread
about OcamIL
-
ben kuin
- Alain Frisch
-
Eray Ozkural
- Ed Keith
- ben kuin
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-05-14 (21:47) |
From: | Vincent Aravantinos <vincent.aravantinos@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL |
Le 14 mai 10 à 23:42, Raoul Duke a écrit : > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Raoul Duke <raould@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:42 PM > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL > To: ben kuin <benkuin@gmail.com> > > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM, ben kuin <benkuin@gmail.com> wrote: >> but that would be the big benefit of a clr like vm: It doesn't matter >> how messed up, chaotic or just heterogen the environment is as long >> as >> you can count on a regular execution of your portable bytecode. > > of course it matters: there must be the resources to get the vm ported > across all the fubar variations of the ecosystem. the combinatorics > has to be dealt with somewhere. that kind of complexity is less in the > hegemonic windows os world, i hypothesize. Please. You're not talking about the same thing. Ben talks about the benefits such a vm would have once it would be done, you talk about how hard it would be to do it.