English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
about OcamIL
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2010-05-14 (21:47)
From: Vincent Aravantinos <vincent.aravantinos@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL

Le 14 mai 10 à 23:42, Raoul Duke a écrit :

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Raoul Duke <raould@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL
> To: ben kuin <benkuin@gmail.com>
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM, ben kuin <benkuin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> but that would be the big benefit of a clr like vm: It doesn't matter
>> how messed up, chaotic or just heterogen the environment is as long  
>> as
>> you can count on a regular execution of your portable bytecode.
> of course it matters: there must be the resources to get the vm ported
> across all the fubar variations of the ecosystem. the combinatorics
> has to be dealt with somewhere. that kind of complexity is less in the
> hegemonic windows os world, i hypothesize.

Please. You're not talking about the same thing. Ben talks about the  
benefits such a vm would have once it would be done, you talk about  
how hard it would be to do it.