English version
Accueil     Ŕ propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis ŕ jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml ŕ l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
OCaml defunctorization and other optimizations
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2010-05-20 (11:40)
From: Julien Signoles <julien.signoles@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml defunctorization and other optimizations

2010/5/20 Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com>

> On 05/20/2010 11:41 AM, Julien Signoles wrote:
> I think that'll have to be someone else than me, as I consider myself
> just a beginner in OCaml.
> However if you think that implementing AST transforms would be possible
> for a beginner (in OCaml, I do have experience with compilers), I'm
> willing to give it a try.

I wrote ocamldefun during my master project where I done both the theory and
the implementation of this tool: I was a beginner both in ocaml and in
functional programming since I only wrote a mini-compiler in ocaml during my
studies without any lecture on functional programming. But ok: there were
ocaml experts in my research team which provide me some wonderful helps :-).

> I think that if there is a defunctorizer written it should live in the
> OCaml distribution itself (maybe in contrib/).

Ocaml is not Coq: there is no such "contrib/" directory ;-). As far as I
know, the Ocaml development team does not accept so much external
contributions (for many good reasons).

> I certainly don't intend to write an external tool that uses OCaml
> internal modules.

That is what ocamldefun actually does.

Best regards,