Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
WAS Re: [Caml-list] Re: The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Grant Rettke <grettke@a...>
Subject: Re: WAS Re: [Caml-list] Re: The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Andrej Bauer <andrej.bauer@andrej.com> wrote:
>>Moreover, the burden of "rec" is tiny so I don't think it is worth
>>discussing in such detail.
>
> Ah, but you are forgetting Wadler's Law.

You mean this:

" Wadler's Law:
       The emotional intensity of debate on a language feature
       increases as one moves down the following scale:
           Semantics,
           Syntax,
           Lexical syntax,
           Comments."?