Browse thread
WAS Re: [Caml-list] Re: The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion
-
Grant Rettke
-
Jon Harrop
-
Andrej Bauer
- Grant Rettke
- Grant Rettke
-
Andrej Bauer
-
Jon Harrop
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2010-05-29 (21:27) |
| From: | Grant Rettke <grettke@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: WAS Re: [Caml-list] Re: The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion |
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Andrej Bauer <andrej.bauer@andrej.com> wrote:
>>Moreover, the burden of "rec" is tiny so I don't think it is worth
>>discussing in such detail.
>
> Ah, but you are forgetting Wadler's Law.
You mean this:
" Wadler's Law:
The emotional intensity of debate on a language feature
increases as one moves down the following scale:
Semantics,
Syntax,
Lexical syntax,
Comments."?