Browse thread
about OcamIL
-
ben kuin
- Alain Frisch
-
Eray Ozkural
- Ed Keith
- ben kuin
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-05-16 (20:31) |
From: | Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@g...> |
Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] about OcamIL |
Xavier Clerc: > Le 14 mai 2010 à 12:40, Jon Harrop a écrit : > > Xavier Clerc wrote: > >> Limiting myself to the JVM... > >> Moreover, at least Scala and Bigloo deliver excellent performances. > > > > I have benchmarks where the JVM is well over 10x slower than .NET. So > > I do not regard any JVM-based language as "high performance". > > Quite ironically, by scratching the surface, one would discover that > both quoted projects can also target .NET (not tested that though). Does Bigloo.NET support value types? Does Scala.NET use .NET (2.0) generics? Not AFAICT. Name dropping them in the context of "high performance" language implementations is more than a little bit silly... Cheers, Jon.