English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
about OcamIL
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2010-05-16 (20:31)
From: Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@g...>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] about OcamIL
Xavier Clerc:
> Le 14 mai 2010 à 12:40, Jon Harrop a écrit :
> > Xavier Clerc wrote:
> >> Limiting myself to the JVM...
> >> Moreover, at least Scala and Bigloo deliver excellent performances.
> >
> > I have benchmarks where the JVM is well over 10x slower than .NET. So
> > I do not regard any JVM-based language as "high performance".
> Quite ironically, by scratching the surface, one would discover that
> both quoted projects can also target .NET (not tested that though).

Does Bigloo.NET support value types? Does Scala.NET use .NET (2.0) generics?
Not AFAICT. Name dropping them in the context of "high performance" language
implementations is more than a little bit silly...