Lukasz Stafiniak wrote:
> But what when someone includes or opens a module with Foo after "type
> foo = Foo"? What when someone opens it locally in an expression?
>   
I would be fine if type-level shadowing was disallowed for all those cases.

> Does a variant value have a unique type with a unique path so that it
> would be possible to guarantee that within this unique path there are
> no type *definitions* that override a variant name?
>   
That would be nice.

Jacques

> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Jacques Carette <carette@mcmaster.ca> wrote:
>   
>> type foo = Foo
>> let x = Foo
>>
>> type foo2 = Foo | Bar
>> let y = Foo
>> let z = (x,y) ;;
>>
>> I thought that re-using of algebraic labels was not allowed - but apparently
>> it is?
>>