Browse thread
about OcamIL
-
ben kuin
- Alain Frisch
-
Eray Ozkural
- Ed Keith
- ben kuin
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Vincent Aravantinos <vincent.aravantinos@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL |
Le 15 mai 10 à 11:45, ben kuin a écrit : >>> What if ocamlopt would be dropped for a faster ocaml vm? >> >> Why? Even if the Ocaml was able to target a faster VM, there >> are still many people who would chose to generate native >> binaries. > > I'd call that a questionable decision. As far as I know, using native > binaries means to open a whole range of potentially uncorrectionable > problems with abi incomptabilities between libraries or with changes > of the underlying os. > > As far as I know when you go native you always have to take abi > incompatibility and therefore recompilation into account. For business > apps, that's a showstopper. Aren't most Windows applications binary ones? Not all Windows apps are .Net based, or run on a whatever vm. Most others are binary, aren't they? If yes it seems this has not been a big showstopper to Windows apps developpers... Maybe I don't get the precise sense of "binary". V.