Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
about OcamIL
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL
ben kuin wrote:

> I assume it's save to say that most today (business) critical
> applications have to be written in a vm supported language.

Why do you assume that?

The only evidence to support this is the widespead usage of
Java and C#, but I think that is a language choice rather than
a conscious decision to use a language that runs on a VM.

People chose Java and C# because they are preferable to
fundamentally unsafe langauges like C and C++.

> What if ocamlopt would be dropped for a faster ocaml vm?

Why? Even if the Ocaml was able to target a faster VM, there
are still many people who would chose to generate native
binaries.

Erik (who uses Ocaml compiled to native binaries for mission
critical code)
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/