Browse thread
[Caml-list] Re: Unix.send blocks
- Paul Steckler
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Paul Steckler <Paul.Steckler@n...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Re: Unix.send blocks |
I wrote: > Sometimes after receiving several requests, the Unix.send call that sends a response > back to a Web client just blocks. The send buffer is pretty large (64k), and the data > to be sent is always much less than that. I've found a solution. When receiving data from the browser, the socket only ever made one call to Unix.recv, even if there was more data available, because in this application, that was always enough. That strategy must have left some internal buffers filled in the socket implementation. When I allow multiple calls to Unix.recv, until all data has been received, all calls to Unix.send proceed. Re the issue of multi-threadedness, I'm unable to build a multi-threaded OCaml application using the Fedora distribution of the MingGW build, for reasons I mentioned in an earlier message to this list. A non-blocking socket wouldn't have helped in this situation, anyway, because the blocking status of the socket wasn't the issue. -- Paul -- Paul Steckler National ICT Australia paul DOT steckler AT nicta.com.au The information in this e-mail may be confidential and subject to legal professional privilege and/or copyright. National ICT Australia Limited accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments.