Version franaise
Home About Download Resources Contact us
Browse thread
Dynlinking plugins defining the same unit name but with different implementations.
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Daniel_Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@e...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Dynlinking plugins defining the same unit name but with different implementations.
> (Note: for dynlink, I believe that loading modules in private mode should be safe.)

No, at least not in 3.12.0+beta1.

Daniel