Hi,

> Why would you use ocsigen to serve static files?

Simplicity.  A single server takes care of dynamic and static content,
making it easy to develop and administer.


> For corefarm.com we put all the files in amazon s3 and we just generate
> on the fly the url to retrieve them (adding the timestamp, signing the
> get parameters etc). 

Yes, S3 is awesome, but I reckon it would be overkill for what Sylvain has
in mind.  Moreover, it does represent an extra -- albeit small -- cost.

Cheers,
Dario Teixeira