Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
interest in a much simpler, but modern, Caml?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Florian Weimer <fw@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] interest in a much simpler, but modern, Caml?
* Jeremy Bem:

> Yes and no, respectively.  In other words, nothing new here.

Oh.  I just happen to think that those two are very high on the list
of things you want to fix once you can start with a clean slate.

> Is there a better approach to polymorphic equality floating around?

Besides type classes?  I'm not sure.  It's probably possible to remove
this feature from the language, with a little bit of syntactic
overhead to pass around a matching comparison function.