Browse thread
interest in a much simpler, but modern, Caml?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@g...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] interest in a much simpler, but modern, Caml? |
> > if Int.(x = 42) then ... else ... > This approach is very nice indeed What happens when you do: if Int.(x = 42 || x = 45) then ... else ... Presumably it either barfs on the assumption that "||" refers to bitwise-or between ints, or we're back to inventing progressively more absurd operator names for each individual combination of types over which they might work. Cheers, Jon.