Le mardi 24 août 2010 10:22:48, Anil Madhavapeddy a écrit :
> That's not quite right; "noalloc" calls do not have the OCaml runtime in a
> functioning state at all since the instructions to set it up are not
> emitted by ocamlopt.
> 
> See [1] for Xavier Leroy's explanation on the matter, which I've quoted
> below:

That's right. Therefore, calling caml_copy_string in noalloc mode is probably 
not a good idea..


Romain