Le mardi 24 août 2010 17:35:15, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> Le mardi 24 août 2010 10:22:48, Anil Madhavapeddy a écrit :
> > That's not quite right; "noalloc" calls do not have the OCaml runtime in
> > a functioning state at all since the instructions to set it up are not
> > emitted by ocamlopt.
> > 
> > See [1] for Xavier Leroy's explanation on the matter, which I've quoted
> > below:
> 
> That's right. Therefore, calling caml_copy_string in noalloc mode is
> probably not a good idea..

but no-one told to do so

there was a boxed value provided to the noalloc function,
but this function does not call caml_copy_string at all

-- 
Regards
Florent