Le mercredi 18 août 2010 à 14:16 -0400, Jianzhou Zhao a écrit :
> Does caml_copy_int64 do all I want?

I believe so, but then I don't know what you want...

> 
> int64_t C_fun();
> 
> CAMLprim value stub()
> {
>   return (caml_copy_int64 (C_fun()));
> }
> 
> Do we still need I64_of_intnat? It is not included in <caml/alloc.h>
> or other headers.

INT64_of_intnat is an internal macro. There is no reason to use it. Your
snippet of code seems correct, but remember that caml_copy_int64 will
allocate values in the heap so you need to use the CAMLparam/CAMLreturn
macro if your function receives arguments from the caml world.