Browse thread
Question about float refs.
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Question about float refs. |
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Ethan Burns <burns.ethan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed a strange behavior when using references to floating point
> values. My suspicion, initially, was that the references would not be
> boxed because they are the same as a record with a single mutable
> field that is of type float. It seems that OCaml still boxes float
> refs.
Note that refs are just a standard polymorphic type defined in Pervasives:
type 'a ref = {
mutable contents : 'a ;
}
Being polymorphic, the "float ref" are not unboxed: imagine what would
happen when you passed them to a function
foo : 'a ref -> 'a list = fun x -> [ !x ]
or similar (with a negative occurrence of polymorphic ref).