Browse thread
interest in a much simpler, but modern, Caml?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@g...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] interest in a much simpler, but modern, Caml? |
> One issue I ran into was syntactic. How would you write: > if 'A' <= c && c <= 'Z' then ... > where c is a char, without polymorphic comparison, and without more radical changes such as type > classes? SML's ad-hoc polymorphism. Would also be nice if you could fill out the primitive types with 32-bit floats, ints of different sizes and so on. Also, would be excellent if you could make the compiler agnostic with regard to the run-time representation of these types so a new back-end could unbox all primitive types. Cheers, Jon.