Browse thread
Question about float refs.
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ethan Burns <burns.ethan@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Question about float refs. |
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umh.ac.be> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 07:52:33 -0400, Ethan Burns wrote: >> >> let r = ref 0.0 ;; >> for i = 0 to 1000000000 do r := float i done; >> Printf.printf "%f\n" !r; >> Printf.printf "words: %f\n" (Gc.stat ()).Gc.minor_words > > To add a precision to others' answers : float refs are unboxed > _locally_. If you rewrite your code as > > let r = ref 0.0 in > for i = 0 to 1000_000_000 do r := float i done; > Printf.printf "%f\n" !r; > Printf.printf "words: %f\n" (Gc.stat ()).Gc.minor_words > > then it runs at about the same speed as you other version. $ time ./a.out 1000000000.000000 words: 2000000367.000000 real 0m2.655s It does seem to run a lot faster than my first version, but it also seems to allocate a whole lot. If it is still allocating just as much why is this version so much faster? Ethan