On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 02:55:29PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:22:49 +0200
> oliver@first.in-berlin.de wrote:
> > 
> > the header-section from ocamlyacc appears in the
> > *.ml file of the parser, but not in the mli-file.
> 
> 
> Maybe menhir is better in that respect (I don't know). Did you try it?
> http://gallium.inria.fr/~fpottier/menhir/
[...]

Hmhh, a while ago I tried around with menhir, but did not really used it.
I have that in mind for cases, when ocamlyacc would become too annoying,
but at least at the moment I'm fine with ocamlyacc.

I thought menhir is necessary for more complex grammars; don't know if it
helps me here.

As this is used for a private project and I have many things that take my attention,
I would like to only change to other tools, if necessary.

Maybe the separate compilation unit approach would be easier in limited time.

But thanks for the hint.

Ciao,
   Oliver