Browse thread
Is OCaml fast?
-
Thanassis Tsiodras
- Gregory Bellier
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Dario Teixeira
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Fabrice Le Fessant
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- David Allsopp
- Cedric Cellier
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Isaac Gouy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-11-23 (22:25) |
From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? |
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:03:10PM +0000, Isaac Gouy wrote: > Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop <at> googlemail.com> writes: > > > > > Note that the regex-dna solution for Haskell tweaks its GC parameters via > > the -H command-line parameter: > > > Note that there is no restriction on "tuning the GC" for regex-dna. > > Note that there is no restriction on "tuning the GC" for any task except > binary-trees. Don't you think this is a pretty ludicrous restriction? Tuning the GC / adjusting the size of pools or mallocs is essential for optimizing for modern processors. I bet the C programs are doing this, except that it won't obviously be called "tuning the GC" although it amounts to precisely the same thing. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat