halting problem discovered practically ;)




Zitat von "David Rajchenbach-Teller" <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr>:

> Hey, guys.
> Time to stop this, please.
>
> Thanks,
>  David
>
> On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote:
>
>> Ed Keith <e_d_k <at> yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>>>> I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a JUSTIFICATION
>>>> for them (which you
>>>>> have been incapable of providing so far).
>>>>
>>>> I feel no need to provide a JUSTIFICATION to you for
>>>> anything.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Am I to interpret this to mean that the rules are purely arbitrary and
>> capricious with no though behind them?
>>
>> Tendentious.
>>
>> A great deal of thought has been given to all aspects of the  
>> benchmarks game.
>>
>>> I hope I am misinterpreting this statement, but can think of no other
>> interpretation
>>
>> Poverty of imagination.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
>> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
>> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
>> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>