Browse thread
Is OCaml fast?
-
Thanassis Tsiodras
- Gregory Bellier
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Dario Teixeira
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Fabrice Le Fessant
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- David Allsopp
- Cedric Cellier
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Isaac Gouy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-11-23 (23:27) |
From: | oliver@f... |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? |
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 02:01:33AM +0000, Isaac Gouy wrote: > David Rajchenbach-Teller <David.Teller <at> univ-orleans.fr> writes: > > > > I can confirm that old code-snippets were removed (and that both faster > solutions and environment > > variable tweaks were rejected). > > > Even back in 2001, Doug Bagley had noted all the things that were > wrong with the tasks on his "The Great Computer Language Shootout". And what was wrong in his eyes? > > During autumn 2004, on Brent Fulgham's website, new tasks were added > and old Doug Bagley tasks removed. > > By 2005 only 2 tasks remained from that old Doug Bagley website. > > By August 2008 none of those old Doug Bagley tasks were measured for > the current benchmarks game. So, now the comparisions are perfect? What problems were removed? Ciao, Oliver