Browse thread
Is OCaml fast?
-
Thanassis Tsiodras
-
Gregory Bellier
- Lukasz Stafiniak
- Thomas Fischbacher
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Dario Teixeira
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Fabrice Le Fessant
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- David Allsopp
- Cedric Cellier
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Isaac Gouy
-
Gregory Bellier
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2010-11-22 (13:39) |
| From: | Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Is OCaml fast? |
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Gregory Bellier <gregory.bellier@gmail.com> wrote: > If you want speed then you should learn assembly or choose C as a second > choice. > It depends on the kind of apps you'd like to write. Even though O'Caml is > fast, it's not the first criteria I have in mind which would be security : > no segfault, no need to handle horrible stuff like in C, ... No! You should use ATS, just as the shootout suggests. (Portable) assembly is not a language for humans ;-)