Browse thread
Is OCaml fast?
-
Thanassis Tsiodras
- Gregory Bellier
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Dario Teixeira
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Fabrice Le Fessant
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- David Allsopp
- Cedric Cellier
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Isaac Gouy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-11-24 (11:33) |
From: | Eray Ozkural <examachine@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? |
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Christophe Troestler < Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umh.ac.be<Christophe.Troestler%2Bocaml@umh.ac.be> > wrote: > On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:50:15 +0000, Isaac Gouy wrote: > > > > Jeff Meister <nanaki <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > > > We know what your rules are for binary-trees; repeating them does > > > not help. > > > > When Christophe TROESTLER wrongly states - "OCaml is not authorized > > to make use of its very own library!" - he shows that those rules > > are not known. > > Isolating a sentence gives a misleading idea of what I said. Must I > really repeat that I was asking WHY is C allowed to use an external > library to enhance its memory management¹ but OCaml cannot use its own > library to do that. I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a > JUSTIFICATION for them (which you have been incapable of providing so > far). > > I didn't get it, either. Best, -- Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct