Browse thread
Is OCaml fast?
-
Thanassis Tsiodras
- Gregory Bellier
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Dario Teixeira
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Fabrice Le Fessant
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- David Allsopp
- Cedric Cellier
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Isaac Gouy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Isaac Gouy <igouy2@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: Is OCaml fast? |
Gerd Stolpmann <info <at> gerd-stolpmann.de> writes: -snip- > I think the shootout is not a good data source. There are definitely > some very poor Ocaml results there, so I'd guess the shootout got > recently more attention by enthusiasts of other languages, and the > current Ocaml programs there are not very good. (I remember Ocaml was #1 > at the shootout a few years ago, faster than C.) So maybe a good > opportunity to post better Ocaml solutions there? Even back in 2001, on Doug Bagley's website called "The Great Computer Language Shootout" Ocaml was not #1- http://web.archive.org/web/20010602051335/www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/craps.shtml Doug Bagley stopped updating his website in Fall 2001. Even back in 2004, when Brent Fulgham started his website using the same programs, OCaml was not #1 http://web.archive.org/web/20040717184911/shootout.alioth.debian.org/craps.php