[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Merging object signatures |
Hi,
> Can't you make foo_t and bar_t class types and foobar_t inherits them
> both?
Thanks for the reply. Yes, in the toy example I posted that would indeed
be an alternative. Still, I'm wondering about the most general case;
suppose I had a function that took an object satisfying both foo_t and bar_t:
val do_something: < foo_t; bar_t; .. > -> bool
This is what I'm wondering if it's possible to express.
Best regards,
Dario Teixeira