Browse thread
Is OCaml fast?
-
Thanassis Tsiodras
- Gregory Bellier
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Dario Teixeira
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Fabrice Le Fessant
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- David Allsopp
- Cedric Cellier
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Isaac Gouy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-11-23 (21:34) |
From: | Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@g...> |
Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? |
Yes, an answer to a better question. > -----Original Message----- > From: caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:caml-list- > bounces@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Isaac Gouy > Sent: 23 November 2010 18:07 > To: caml-list@inria.fr > Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? > > Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop <at> googlemail.com> writes: > > > Ketil Malde crafted > > a much better solution but noted: > > > > "This is considered cheating, since it is the easy and natural way > to do > > it." - > > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Shootout/Knucleotide > > > Not even cheating - just an answer to a different question. > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs