Browse thread
SMP multithreading
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-11-16 (20:35) |
From: | Eray Ozkural <examachine@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] SMP multithreading |
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>wrote: > Am Montag, den 15.11.2010, 22:46 -0800 schrieb Edgar Friendly: > * As somebody mentioned "implicit parallelization": Don't expect > anything from this. Even if a good compiler finds ways to > parallelize 20% of the code (which would be a lot), the runtime > effect would be marginal. 80% of the code is run at normal speed > (hopefully) and dominates the runtime behavior. The point is > that such compiler-driven code improvements are only local > optimizations. For getting good parallelization results you need > to restructure the design of the program - well, maybe > compiler2.0 can do this at some time, but this is not in sight. > I think you are underestimating parallelizing compilers. -- Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct