Browse thread
Is OCaml fast?
-
Thanassis Tsiodras
- Gregory Bellier
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Dario Teixeira
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Fabrice Le Fessant
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- David Allsopp
- Cedric Cellier
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Isaac Gouy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | oliver@f... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? |
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:50:58PM +0100, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote: [...] > The main problem was that other languages have bigger standard > libraries, whereas OCaml has a very small one (just what is needed > to compile the compiler, actually). In many problems, you could > benefit from using a very simple shared-memory library (in > mandelbrot, the ocaml multicore solution has to copy the image in a > socket between processes, whereas it could just be in a shared > memory segment), ...so you work on a shared-mem module?! > and in general, many solutions could benefit from > specialised data structures that are provided in other languages by > their standard libraries, and from some system calls that are > currently not in the Unix library. [...] During the last some releases a lot more unix syscalls were added and that's fine of course). Which calls are you missing there? Ciao, Oliver