Browse thread
Is OCaml fast?
-
Thanassis Tsiodras
- Gregory Bellier
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Dario Teixeira
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Fabrice Le Fessant
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- David Allsopp
- Cedric Cellier
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Isaac Gouy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Isaac Gouy <igouy2@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: Is OCaml fast? |
Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler+ocaml <at> umh.ac.be> writes: -snip- > The question is why is C allowed to use > an external library for managing its memory I asked why you think C should not be allowed to use memory pools - you haven't tried to answer that question. If you think that C should not be allowed to use memory pools because they are provided in an external library then I disagree - I think it's fine to show use of popular external libraries. Of course, a C program that just uses malloc is also shown. > but — for this specific > benchmark which is precisely about managing memory — OCaml is not > authorized to make use of its very own library! OCaml is authorized to make use of its very own library. Just like all the other programming language implementations, for binary-trees, OCaml is not authorized to tune the GC.