Browse thread
Is OCaml fast?
-
Thanassis Tsiodras
- Gregory Bellier
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Dario Teixeira
-
Gerd Stolpmann
- Sylvain Le Gall
- bluestorm
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- Fabrice Le Fessant
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- David Allsopp
- Cedric Cellier
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Isaac Gouy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-11-24 (10:24) |
From: | Christophe Troestler <Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? |
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:50:15 +0000, Isaac Gouy wrote: > > Jeff Meister <nanaki <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > We know what your rules are for binary-trees; repeating them does > > not help. > > When Christophe TROESTLER wrongly states - "OCaml is not authorized > to make use of its very own library!" - he shows that those rules > are not known. Isolating a sentence gives a misleading idea of what I said. Must I really repeat that I was asking WHY is C allowed to use an external library to enhance its memory management¹ but OCaml cannot use its own library to do that. I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a JUSTIFICATION for them (which you have been incapable of providing so far). C. ¹ Apparently the "Please don't implement your own custom memory pool or free list." does not count if it's implemented by others!