Browse thread
Is OCaml fast?
-
Thanassis Tsiodras
- Gregory Bellier
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Dario Teixeira
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Fabrice Le Fessant
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- David Allsopp
- Cedric Cellier
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Isaac Gouy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christophe Raffalli <craff73@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? |
Le 29/11/10 12:44, oliver@first.in-berlin.de a écrit : > yes. > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:25:52AM -0000, Jon Harrop wrote: >> I assume he means one thread has one behaviour and another has the other behaviour, in which case there certainly is a problem! Then, I do not know what you can do ... Each thread does not have its own minor heap, so the size is the same for all ... probably in this case you want to favor reactivity and keep the minor heap small ? Anyway, In this situation, even with the default size, with Posix thread, I do have problems with too slow switching with one thread computing while the other is in charge of the interface ... Cheers, Christophe