Browse thread
Is OCaml fast?
-
Thanassis Tsiodras
- Gregory Bellier
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Dario Teixeira
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Fabrice Le Fessant
- Oliver Bandel
- Isaac Gouy
- David Allsopp
- Cedric Cellier
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Isaac Gouy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Pierre Etchemaïté <petchema@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Is OCaml fast? |
Le Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:33:34 +0200, Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> a écrit : > Not sure what the max should be for the minor heap increase, but based > on this benchmark increasing size of minor heap never slows down the > program. Even when size of minor heap exceeds what fits in the cache. > I guess there is another microbenchmark that can show the opposite > though. Another consequence of increasing minor heap size is the latency introduced by minor heap collections. That said, when does it become the worse garbage collector latency? (... when heap compaction is disabled?) And of course, for many programs such latency matters a lot less than thoughput...