Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] zero-arity constructor
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-12-01 (14:22) |
From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] zero-arity constructor |
On 2010-11-28, at 12:13, Alain Frisch wrote: > As I've been designated as the primary responsible for that uninspired change (I plead guilty), I guess it is my responsibility to state here that frankly, I don't give a damn. That said, enabling the warning by default sounds better to me than reverting the change or introducing a new syntax. I still like the change, because it gets rid of a special case. I'll enable the warning by default. -- Damien