Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@g...>
Subject: RE: ocamlopt LLVM support (Was: [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT)
Benedikt wrote:
> So, let's take that LLVM thing to a somewhat more serious level (which
> means no more arguing with toy projects that simply ignore the
> difficult stuff).

You can learn a lot from prototypes.

> 3. A better LLVM. If we do it right, other's implementing functional
> languages using LLVM will not be faced with the same problems again.
> Dunno if that's possible.

What exactly are you thinking of that goes beyond what the other functional
languages that already target LLVM have already had to implement?

Cheers,
Jon.