Browse thread
OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-12-05 (16:57) |
From: | Török Edwin <edwintorok@g...> |
Subject: | Re: ocamlopt LLVM support (Was: [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT) |
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:37:32 +0100 Benedikt Meurer <benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com> wrote: > Two main areas for now: The GC interface and the exception handling. > LLVM's exception support is really limited; the GC support is better > and more generic. I don't know how to implement the OCaml exception > model within LLVM w/o adding a lot of special case stuff to LLVM > itself (mentioned in my original post); if there would be a way to > easily extend LLVM with special exception models, other projects > could plug in their models. There is a discussion on the LLVM mailing list about changing exception handling in LLVM: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-December/036692.html If the new model is not generic enough to support OCaml's model, then I think now would be a good time to describe on the LLVM ML what OCaml's model would need and the proposal doesn't cover. Best regards, --Edwin