Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@g...>
Subject: RE: ocamlopt LLVM support (Was: [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT)
Richard Jones wrote:
> It might kick-start efforts to automatically generate bindings, at
> least to C code, which wouldn't be a bad thing.  camlidl is clumsy and
> doesn't handle a very important case (pointers to handles) so it's not
> really useful for this.

Yes, LLVM is ideal for this. Using LLVM to JIT compile OCaml<->C interop
stubs should be quite easy. I did a bit of this in some of the OCaml Journal
article that were on LLVM.

You could also kill two birds with one stone by creating an OCaml<->HLVM
bridge with it. That would make it easier to create a bigarray from OCaml
and call into high-performance parallel numerical code to chomp on it.

Cheers,
Jon.