Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: ivan chollet <ivan.chollet@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT
20 full time programmers, but if each of them has 1/40 of the skills of X.
Leroy, LLVM will get only 50% of the caml native compiler performance.
I'm not sure hype is correlated with value as you seem to imply but i might
be wrong.

This was the troll of the day.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Jon Harrop <
jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Erik wrote:
> > Jon wrote:
> > > LLVM is also much better documented than ocamlopt's internals.
> >
> > LLVM has well over 20 full time programmers working on it. The
> > Ocaml compiler has how many?
>
> Another reason why LLVM deserves its hype.
>
> Cheers,
> Jon.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>