Browse thread
OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT
-
Benedikt Meurer
- Török Edwin
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-12-01 (13:55) |
From: | ivan chollet <ivan.chollet@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT |
20 full time programmers, but if each of them has 1/40 of the skills of X. Leroy, LLVM will get only 50% of the caml native compiler performance. I'm not sure hype is correlated with value as you seem to imply but i might be wrong. This was the troll of the day. On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Jon Harrop < jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com> wrote: > Erik wrote: > > Jon wrote: > > > LLVM is also much better documented than ocamlopt's internals. > > > > LLVM has well over 20 full time programmers working on it. The > > Ocaml compiler has how many? > > Another reason why LLVM deserves its hype. > > Cheers, > Jon. > > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >