Browse thread
Value types (Was: [Caml-list] ocamlopt LLVM support)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Török Edwin <edwintorok@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: Value types (Was: [Caml-list] ocamlopt LLVM support) |
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:05:34 -0000 Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com> wrote: > Edwin wrote: > > AFAICT LLVM's OCaml bindings are only good for generating LLVM IR > > from OCaml, not for actually performing transformations on it > > (there is no binding to retrieve the type of a value for example). > > I'll probably be looking into fixing that in the near future, and > > this may indirectly help your LLVM backend (if you intend to write > > OCaml specific transformations on the LLVM IR). > > That's a lot of work. Wouldn't it be preferable to do the passes on > the OCaml side and focus on generating high quality LLVM IR? Yes, that is probably a better approach (generating the optimized IR in the first place). Best regards, --Edwin