Re: arity of type constructors

From: Hubert Canon (Hubert.Canon@irisa.fr)
Date: Mon May 12 1997 - 09:08:04 MET DST


From: Hubert Canon <Hubert.Canon@irisa.fr>
Message-Id: <199705120708.JAA01806@hetre.irisa.fr>
Subject: Re: arity of type constructors
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Date: Mon, 12 May 97 9:08:04 MET DST

> # type t = T of int * int;;
> type t = | T of int * int
> # T(3,4);;

I do not understand why we don't use another syntax for constructors :

If we had something like :
# T 3 4;;
- : t = (T 3 4)

it would be less confusing.

-- 
Hubert Canon



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:10 MET