Re: alloc_final() and alloc()

From: doligez@pa.dec.com
Date: Tue Dec 22 1998 - 19:33:08 MET


From: doligez@pa.dec.com
Message-Id: <199812221833.AA29483@pontiac.pa.dec.com>
To: Vincent BARAT <vincent.barat@alcatel.fr>
Subject: Re: alloc_final() and alloc()
In-Reply-To: Message of Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:03:35 +0100
    from Vincent BARAT <vincent.barat@alcatel.fr>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 10:33:08 -0800

>From: Vincent BARAT <vincent.barat@alcatel.fr>

>So, I've discovered a problem with alloc(): it seems to return
>always the same address if it is used several times in the same function
>that contains also calls to alloc_final().
>
>Is it a known bug ? If not, am I missing something ?

It is possible if you're giving strange arguments to alloc_final,
in which case, it is not a bug.

If you could send the relevant piece of your code to
<caml-light@inria.fr> (which is the correct address for bug reports),
we should be able to tell what's going on.

-- Damien



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:17 MET