Re: CamlIDL - stub code generator and COM binding for OCaml

From: Pierre Weis (Pierre.Weis@inria.fr)
Date: Wed Mar 10 1999 - 10:11:06 MET


From: Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@inria.fr>
Message-Id: <199903100911.KAA27078@pauillac.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: CamlIDL - stub code generator and COM binding for OCaml
To: Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr (Xavier Leroy)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:11:06 +0100 (MET)
In-Reply-To: <19990309170720.03713@pauillac.inria.fr> from "Xavier Leroy" at Mar 9, 99 05:07:20 pm

Why not having a way to explicitely designate the label of the type ?
For instance foo`lab would designate the label lab of the type foo.

This is not ambiguous and furthermore it solves the problem of another
useful extension, namely anonymous record arguments of constructors:
C`lab would also designate the label lab of the argument of
constructor C.

All the best,

Pierre Weis

INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://cristal.inria.fr/~weis/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:20 MET