Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?

From: Max Skaller (maxs@in.ot.com.au)
Date: Thu Apr 20 2000 - 03:44:07 MET DST

  • Next message: Christophe Raffalli: "Re: Caml wish list"

    Vitaly Lugovsky wrote:
    >
    > P.S. Maybe, all that we need, is a RAD tool for ocaml? It can
    > look like a better module finder ("module name" -> "file name" is not
    > a good idea. Paths in Java is much better), and a lot of reusable
    > modules for common tasks (database, GUI)...

            There already is one: the lablbrowser. It's quite
    good functionally -- but the interface sucks.

    -- 
    John (Max) Skaller at OTT [Open Telecommications Ltd]
    mailto:maxs@in.ot.com.au      -- at work
    mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au  -- at home
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 20 2000 - 09:55:59 MET DST