Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?

From: Remi VANICAT (remi.vanicat@labri.u-bordeaux.fr)
Date: Tue Apr 25 2000 - 12:50:01 MET DST

  • Next message: Remi VANICAT: "Re: Ocaml and (the lack of) RAD tools"

    Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> writes:

    > * editor functionality is reduced to a minimum, because real
    > programmers use emacs anyway.

    a nice amelioration of ocamlbrowser may be the use of an external
    editor, (and, as emacs offer, with emacsclient or gnudoit a way to be
    use by an external program, it would be very useful...)

    -- 
    Rémi Vanicat
    vanicat@labri.u-bordeaux.fr
    http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~vanicat
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 28 2000 - 11:52:36 MET DST