You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Original bug ID: 4612 Reporter: ais Status: closed (set by @mshinwell on 2016-12-07T17:30:40Z) Resolution: won't fix Priority: normal Severity: feature Version: 3.10.2 Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
Bug description
Occasionally, during the process of incremental development it becomes apparent that a break/continue statement is just what is needed. The alternative is to refactor to a recursive style, but this is not always desirable when it causes additional work or when copying an algorithm out of a recipe book.
Additional information
Please investigate Sanghyeon Seo's patch from the Caml list for possible inclusion. Break and continue are desireable only if they can be implemented without overhead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original bug ID: 4612
Reporter: ais
Status: closed (set by @mshinwell on 2016-12-07T17:30:40Z)
Resolution: won't fix
Priority: normal
Severity: feature
Version: 3.10.2
Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
Bug description
Occasionally, during the process of incremental development it becomes apparent that a break/continue statement is just what is needed. The alternative is to refactor to a recursive style, but this is not always desirable when it causes additional work or when copying an algorithm out of a recipe book.
Additional information
Please investigate Sanghyeon Seo's patch from the Caml list for possible inclusion. Break and continue are desireable only if they can be implemented without overhead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: