You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Original bug ID: 5209 Reporter:@dra27 Assigned to:@xclerc Status: closed (set by @xavierleroy on 2012-09-25T18:06:17Z) Resolution: fixed Priority: normal Severity: block Version: 3.12.0 Fixed in version: 3.12.1+dev Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general) Related to:#5273
Bug description
The test for FreeBSD for natdynlink support in OCaml's configure script seems to be incorrect. I don't know why the cases contain a 'k' or why i386 (the default name for x86) is not included. Is kfreebsd ever a correct symbol? Removing it and allowing 386 allows successful use of natdynlink on FreeBSD 8.1 (a simple test works as well).
This bug would seem to have been introduced with 3.12.0 (the version of configure in 3.11.2 doesn't do this which is presumably why the BSD port maintainer hasn't reported a bug...)
Additional information
The line numbers aren't correct (I'd changed some other things in configure) but the context should be enough:
Original bug ID: 5209
Reporter: @dra27
Assigned to: @xclerc
Status: closed (set by @xavierleroy on 2012-09-25T18:06:17Z)
Resolution: fixed
Priority: normal
Severity: block
Version: 3.12.0
Fixed in version: 3.12.1+dev
Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
Related to: #5273
Bug description
The test for FreeBSD for natdynlink support in OCaml's configure script seems to be incorrect. I don't know why the cases contain a 'k' or why i386 (the default name for x86) is not included. Is kfreebsd ever a correct symbol? Removing it and allowing 386 allows successful use of natdynlink on FreeBSD 8.1 (a simple test works as well).
This bug would seem to have been introduced with 3.12.0 (the version of configure in 3.11.2 doesn't do this which is presumably why the BSD port maintainer hasn't reported a bug...)
Additional information
The line numbers aren't correct (I'd changed some other things in configure) but the context should be enough:
@@ -626,8 +639,9 @@
i[3456]86--darwin[89]) natdynlink=true;;
powerpc64--linux) natdynlink=true;;
sparc--linux) natdynlink=true;;
i386-*-gnu0.3) natdynlink=true;;
esac
fi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: