You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Original bug ID: 5294 Reporter: v_monfort Assigned to:@zoggy Status: closed (set by @damiendoligez on 2012-09-20T14:25:42Z) Resolution: fixed Priority: normal Severity: minor Target version: 4.00.1+dev Category: ocamldoc Related to:#5067
Bug description
I used particular names for some polymorphic types in my .mli files but these
names were replaced with default names by ocamldoc in the documentation.
E.g.:
.mli:
type ('dom,'tf) manager = {
bot : 'dom;
...
}
.html:
type ('a, 'b) manager = {
bot : 'a;
...
}
I think it would be a good thing to could keep the name information because it makes the documentation more readable. Moreover the documentation text explaining theses types does not correspond anymore in html documentation (explaining 'dom type instead of 'a type).
Original bug ID: 5294
Reporter: v_monfort
Assigned to: @zoggy
Status: closed (set by @damiendoligez on 2012-09-20T14:25:42Z)
Resolution: fixed
Priority: normal
Severity: minor
Target version: 4.00.1+dev
Category: ocamldoc
Related to: #5067
Bug description
I used particular names for some polymorphic types in my .mli files but these
names were replaced with default names by ocamldoc in the documentation.
E.g.:
.mli:
type ('dom,'tf) manager = {
bot : 'dom;
...
}
.html:
type ('a, 'b) manager = {
bot : 'a;
...
}
I think it would be a good thing to could keep the name information because it makes the documentation more readable. Moreover the documentation text explaining theses types does not correspond anymore in html documentation (explaining 'dom type instead of 'a type).
Additional information
This could be related to issue #5067
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: