You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Original bug ID: 7126 Reporter:@alainfrisch Status: acknowledged (set by @damiendoligez on 2016-02-08T11:40:34Z) Resolution: open Priority: normal Severity: feature Target version: undecided Category: standard library Monitored by:@gasche@diml@jmeber@hcarty
Bug description
One could use the new attribute that control inlining for stdlib functions, in order to avoid regression e.g. on #5872 (and also to avoid tweaking inlining factor in stdlib/Compflag).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One could also use the opposite attribute to prevent inlining of stdlib functions when it is never profitable, e.g. some I/O functions. But one should volunteer to do this work and no one has so far.
This issue has been open one year with no activity. Consequently, it is being marked with the "stale" label. What this means is that the issue will be automatically closed in 30 days unless more comments are added or the "stale" label is removed. Comments that provide new information on the issue are especially welcome: is it still reproducible? did it appear in other contexts? how critical is it? etc.
Original bug ID: 7126
Reporter: @alainfrisch
Status: acknowledged (set by @damiendoligez on 2016-02-08T11:40:34Z)
Resolution: open
Priority: normal
Severity: feature
Target version: undecided
Category: standard library
Monitored by: @gasche @diml @jmeber @hcarty
Bug description
One could use the new attribute that control inlining for stdlib functions, in order to avoid regression e.g. on #5872 (and also to avoid tweaking inlining factor in stdlib/Compflag).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: